 |
|
 |









 |
| |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
I find it awfully misleading that the specs Dell provided for my PC stated that the memory was upgradeable to 4.0 GB when I come to find out after upgrading my video card that there's no way to address more than around 3.0 GB of physical RAM with a 32-bit processor. This fact of computing life, explained here in some detail, was unknown to me until I rebooted my PC after installation of the new video card, checked the "System" properties under the Windows Control Panel, and saw that my 3.0 GB of installed memory had become 2.5 GB. Had the Cookie Monster come along and eaten one of my original memory modules, I wondered? I powered down, checked that all was still secure in the slots, and booted again. BIOS showed 3.0 GB of total memory installed, but Windows still recognized only 2.5 GB. Only after asking a few people who I knew to be more tech savvy than me and searching the internet a bit did I come to realize that I was "missing" half a GB RAM because the new video card held 512 MB, which was being counted first. Essentially, this means I've hit the ceiling as far as RAM goes on my machine. Apparently, 1.0 GB of the addressable space was already taken up by system ROM and various factory installed PCI cards. When I added the 2.0 GB of new RAM to the original 1.0 GB, I pushed it right to the limit, and adding the new video card pushed it over. Presumably, this shouldn't affect my system's performance much for gaming, since there's now 512 MB of dedicated RAM on the graphics card where before there was zero, but it still annoys me that Dell's specs say the machine can handle up to 4.0 GB of RAM and every time I visit their site, they're trying to offer me more memory. And I'm glad that I didn't pay the extra $300 they wanted for 4.0 GB of RAM when I ordered the system back in 2004. Tags: computer Current Mood: nerdy
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |

|
 |